The Slate researchΒΆ
Research brief, The Morporkian Civil Liberties Union (MCLU)
The refectory at a city school takes payment without coin. For seven years it did that by thumb: a pupil pressed a thumb to a brass plate and the meal was charged to an account. This year the plate came out and a device that recognises faces went in. The queue moves faster and nobody has to remember anything.
Parents were told when the thumbprints started, seven years ago, and every family since has been told the same way at enrolment: a note with a slip to return if they would rather their child did not take part. Most slips do not come back. The school has read that silence as agreement ever since, and reads the same note as covering the face as well as the thumb.
The school is concealing nothing. It will describe the whole arrangement to anyone who writes in, it believes the arrangement is lawful, and until the MCLU asked, nobody had suggested otherwise.
Most of the pupils are old enough to decide this for themselves. None of them was asked, then or now. Nobody assessed what the change from thumbs to faces might cost before the change was made, because the thumbs had been uneventful for seven years and this was understood to be the same thing, only quicker.
Does a note sent home seven years ago, answered by silence, and concerning a thumb, reach as far as a face?
The people it is about were never the people asked. Who was entitled to decide, and what follows from the fact that nobody put the question to them?
Last updated: 17 September 2026